Our own columnist Paddy Johnson, czarina of the New York art blogosphere and editorial director of Art Fag City, was as surprised as we were yesterday to learn that she—along with Gawker, ArtInfo-publisher Louise Blouin Media, the International Council of Museums, the Georgia Museum of Art and more—is being sued for libel by Peter Paul Biro, a Canadian art authenticator whose controversial forensic approach was the subject of an investigation by the New Yorker back in July 2010. Biro filed a libel suit against the New Yorker in July of this year because of the article’s rather damning estimation of his fingerprint-analyzing art authentication method, and he is now going after bloggers for essentially re-posting the NYer‘s article.
While the smaller defendants in this multi-pronged libel suit may not have the means to fight Biro’s case, Lee Rosenbaum notes, a court victory for the New Yorker would ensure all media (and museum) outlets emerge unscathed:
You can see the part about Johnson on P. 40 of the supplemental complaint filed this month by Biro against her and the other new defendants in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. I hope Paddy emerges from this unscathed. Art Fag City is one of the most popular sites in the art blogosphere. Presumably the deep-pocketed Condé Nast is defending this vigorously. A New Yorker victory could float all boats.
The original libel suit, Courthouse News reports, sought $2 million from Condé Nast and David Grann, the investigative journalist who wrote the original article. According to Biro the new batch of defendants named in the amended complaint are guilty of defamation due to their assumption that “it must be true because it’s in the New Yorker.”