The proposed Bedford Historic District—between Bedford and Tompkins avenues, Monroe and Fulton streets, roughly 16 blocks with about 800 buildings—fostered strong debate earlier this week at a meeting with the Landmarks Preservation Committee, the
Times reported. Natives said it was an attempt for gentrifiers to push them out; supporters said it would help and honor natives. Here's a breakdown of their arguments. [
photo]
ConOpponents say that new regulations and increased property values will raise rents and push out many of the people—poorer, older African- and Caribbean-Americans—who stayed through tough times to make Bed-Stuy great. "What needs to be preserved are the people of Bedford-Stuyvesant,” one resident
told the
Times. “I’d hate to see us become a Harlem, where the jewel has been extracted.” [
photo]

- Look what happened in Bushwick. Ewwwwww.
ProBut others say the designation would protect such residents, especially from speculative developers with their gruesome condos. “Developers don’t care about people who live in neighborhoods,"
said one resident. "They care about money.” [
photo]

- A 95-year-old supporter at the hearing
Anti-CommissionA third group is angry at the Landmarks Commission. Some community leaders and more than 200 residents signed a petition saying they didn't know if they were for or against historic districting because they haven't been given enough information. The recent hearing was held on a weekday. In Manhattan. (Commissioners counter that they have held at least 15 meetings locally...)
Follow Henry Stewart on Twitter @henrycstewart