Tuesday, August 19, 2008

How Fiction Works, According to the List of Works Cited in the Bibliography of James Wood's 'How Fiction Works'

Posted by Mark on Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM

Well, a white person, or Ralph Ellison, sits down at a typewriter and...

Ok. I was really glad to see Walter Kirn take everybody's Best and Most Influential Living Literary Critic down a peg in the Times Book Review this past weekend, as the limits to Wood's approach have been bugging me for a long time. I've always thought that Wood is a hell of a lot better at writing about stuff he likes than he is at writing about stuff he doesn't like — sort of like a pre-self-parody Armond White, and like White his tastes run to the classical, with a fuddyduddyish strain of purism. I expect How Fiction Works to be a pretty good and illuminating manual on (and advocate for) literary technique as it exists in the vaguely defined realm of "realism", because Wood's a guy who can really teach you a lot about the construction of meaning in storytelling. I also expect the book to at best ignore and at worst be openly hostile to writing that engages with theory or literary history or language for its own sake. (I don't really begrudge Wood his taste, but I'd like us to start spreading our admiration around a bit, to critics like... well, actually, like Ben Kunkel, for instance, who are as good as he is when writing from a political perspective, for instance.)

I was also glad Kirn flagged Wood's paternalistic tone, which is pretty grating. From the Preface:

"[Roland Barthes and Viktor Shklovsky] come to conclusions about the novel that seem to me interesting but wrongheaded..."
And:
"[The questions I address in this book] are old questions, some of which have been resuscitated by recent work in academic criticism and literary theory; but I am not sure that academic criticism and literary theory have answered them very well."
Oh, opposing approaches "seem to me" to be off the mark, "I am not sure" that they're productive. God, I love the arrogance of that false self-effacement tone, I the Humble James Wood don't wish to deny the validity of the approach, it's only my opinion... and being my opinion I don't really have to explain it at length.

(Here, J. Rob Lennon says much that I agree with about Wood, but also rips into Kirn for the reverse-snob tone of his review, which is fair. It perplexed me, too, not least because Wood, who gets off on telling people that Pynchon and DeLillo and postmodernism and theory are ass-naked emperors, is nothing if not a reverse snob himself.)

Comments (5) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Generic user icon

I was surprised how angry J. Rob got there in his rebuttal. To bring up Kirn's education and his marriege to Margot Kidder's daughter as proof that Kirn is what, an upper class blue-blood? Sort of misses the point, since Kidder was practically or actually homeless at some point in the 90s? And I think the cover is ugly...

Posted by gjk on August 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

I dunno, when I look at the cover I get false nostalgia for other people's memories of this:

http://www.nassaulibrary.org/YABookLog/THE%20CATCHER%20IN%20THE%20RYE%20COVER.jpg

Which is exactly the kind of universally accessible seriousness that the literary world seemed to possess during the postwar years when people still read. So I dig the cover.

Posted by Mark on August 19, 2008 at 12:24 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

i was never a huge fan of wood (mainly, i admit, based on his reputation for stodginess) — but this is a really lovely book. kirn actually does a lot of pretty willful misreading and self-serving re-interpretation of what wood's saying. his review smacks so clearly of someone going in with an axe to grind it's sort of sad... It's exactly the kind of kneejerk dogmatism Kirn doesn't like about Wood. I'll try to articulate these thoughts more better soon, and post something.

Posted by Jonny Diamond on August 19, 2008 at 12:25 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

It reminded me of this cover, which really sticks out on my big giant wall of books:

http://www.pprize.com/BookDetail.php?bk=61

that shade of red just makes me get so angry...

Anyway yeah, Lit Crit, exciting stuff! Next time they meet I imagine cheese and crackers will be flying...

btw- My lit crit prof was David Richter, and he has a couple of books out on this subject, in case anyone is interested. Or you can take a class with him which is even better I think, at QC. here's his link at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url?%5Fencoding=UTF8&search-type=ss&index=books&field-author=David%20H.%20Richter

Posted by George on August 19, 2008 at 12:26 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

NERDS!!

Posted by Anonymous on August 19, 2008 at 12:27 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

Most Commented On

Most Emailed Stories

Top Viewed Stories

© 2010