Monday, November 16, 2009

Wouldn't It Just Be Better to Let One Lucky Daily News Reader Strangle the Ft. Hood Shooter with His Bare Hands?

Posted By on Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Were you aware that, in America, there are several layers of legal processes to ensure that citizens accused of crimes are given a fair trial? And that, in the case of heinous and high-profile crimes, due to the complexity of these processes and the care with which our legal professionals are duty-bound to proceed, the wheels of justice sometimes turn slowly?

Nice work "reporting" this "news", Daily News Washington Bureau Chief Thomas M. Defrank. Here are some choice selections from today's article "Could take decades to execute Fort Hood massacre suspect Nidal Hasan, but it didn't take the Daily News long at all to realize that inspiring or pandering to outrage bordering on bloodlust is the surest way to appeal to readers regardless of the possible long-term damages the media can do to our democracy by behaving so cynically" (the stuff after the comma is mostly implied):

The slaughter took just seven minutes, but the wheels of justice will grind on for years or even decades if Maj. Nidal Hasan is sentenced to die.

Does that "if" seem disingenuous to you? Read on.

No matter how heinous his crimes, the Army psychiatrist is entitled to two separate appeals to the Supreme Court.

...The cost to taxpayers of his incarceration and legal appeals might reach $30 million, various legal analyses show.

...Hasan's military and civilian lawyers are almost certain to file requests for a change of venue, psychiatric assessment and other pretrial motions, further extending the agonizing delays.

If convicted, Hasan still would be decades away from execution by lethal injection because he can appeal his sentence to at least seven jurisdictions.

... Lawyers say [a case roughly analogous to Maj. Hasan's] will drag on for several more years and reach the Supreme Court a second time.

You know, it's weird (and infuriating): it's almost as if this country's code of laws were written by clearheaded people not in the throes of burning impotent rage. Which is odd: I mean, wouldn't you be perfectly happy to have your constitutional rights and protections subject to swift fluctuations in public opinion among people with no personal connection to the crime in question?

It probably goes without saying that the reader comments to this article will make you feel exactly as bad about America as you'd expect, because America, seriously, the fuck?

Tags: , , ,


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Mark Asch

  • The Counterlife: Listen Up Philip

    Young Brooklyn filmmaker Alex Ross Perry's bracing, mature third feature is about literature, life, and the moments when they at least threaten to intersect.
    • Oct 8, 2014
  • Boom and Bust: The Overnighters

    A documentary about the impact of the fracking boom in North Dakota gets more personal than it bargained for.
    • Oct 8, 2014
  • More »

Most Commented On

  • 4 Art Exhibits You Need to See

    In which Francesco Clemente appears with Nas and Patti Smith, and in which certain picks are prefaced by anti-picks.
    • Oct 9, 2014
  • The Best Old Movies on a Big Screen This Week

    Brando does Shakespeare, Hou does history, Capra does populism and Georgian cinema re-does Stalin.
    • Oct 8, 2014
  • More »

Most Shared Stories

Top Viewed Stories

Top Topics in The Measure

Film (15)

Art (5)

Music (4)

© 2014 The L Magazine
Website powered by Foundation