
Best Actor
Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart
George Clooney, Up in the Air
Colin Firth, A Single Man
Morgan Freeman, Invictus
Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker
WILL WIN: You may have heard that this Jeff Bridges fellow is due.
SHOULD WIN: I'm tastefully unexcited about these choices. If I were voting, I'd probably cast it for Jeremy Renner; The Hurt Locker was far more of a character study than a thriller or a drama and Renner carries it.
MISSING: Matt Damon got a consolation nomination in the supporting category, but his work in The Informant! deserves the recognition.

Best Supporting Actor
Matt Damon, Invictus
Woody Harrelson, The Messenger
Christopher Plummer, The Last Station
Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones
Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds
WILL WIN: That's a bingo! Waltz has had this sewn up for months.
SHOULD WIN: Man, this category is usually aces, and it kind of sucks this year. Waltz deserves it and I can't even really figure a worthwhile alternative. Maybe Harrelson… for Zombieland!
MISSING: If you want scenery-chewing villainy, and this category usually does, there's Peter Capaldi swearing up a storm for In the Loop.
Best Supporting Actress
Penelope Cruz, Nine
Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air
Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart
Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air
Mo'Nique, Precious
WILL WIN: Mo'Nique.
SHOULD WIN: Any of these ladies would be deserving, minus maybe Cruz (you shouldn't get an award just for being enjoyable in a terrible movie). Just to be contrary, I'd be happy to see an Up in the Air gal get it.
MISSING: Cruz's Nine co-star Marion Cotillard rocked it in Public Enemies.

Editing
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Precious
WILL WIN: The Hurt Locker.
SHOULD WIN: I don't claim to understand all of the nuances that go into editing, but Basterds is a two-and-a-half-hour movie with like, a dozen scenes, and it's riveting. Surely the editor has something to do with that. [It's Sally Menke, QT's regular editor, who has developed a very close feel for his filmmaking rhythms. Or, possibly, based on what we've seen of him in person, has actually imposed a fair amount of rhythm on him. That said, one of the things the husband-and-wife team of Bob Murawski and Chris Innis were responsible for, with Hurt Locker, was balancing multiple perspectives in several action set pieces shot simultaneously with several cameras—it's the sort of movie that usually gets editing awards but for once it's actually an impressive storytelling achievement in addition to a technical one. -Ed.]
MISSING: Again, Public Enemies was one of the strongest technical achievements of the year.

Makeup
Il Divo [Wait, what? OMG So Random. -Ed.]
Star Trek
The Young Victoria
WILL WIN: Maybe Star Trek? Star Trek!
SHOULD WIN: Star Trek!
MISSING: You know what, I think they covered it.
Art Direction
Avatar
The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus
Nine
Sherlock Holmes
The Young Victoria
WILL WIN: If this category featured a clear alternative to Avatar, I wouldn't be surprised to see voters reject mostly-virtual set design. But none of these are exciting, so: Avatar.
SHOULD WIN: Imaginarium certainly rocked that Gilliam derelict (in the Zoolander sense). But I'm fine with Avatar winning. They created a whole planet.
MISSING: Just as the Academy will nominate any period piece for this award, I would sub in just about any sci-fi or fantasy movie I liked at all: Moon, Where the Wild Things Are, The Box [Though you make another very good point about the Academy's blindered understanding of the many things that could conceivably count as art direction, costume design, cinematography, etc., I will humbly offer that I found the 70s-suburban design of The Box a little too funny-ha-ha, what with the corny wallpaper and the Corvette and Diaz's Farrah wings. But still. Also, given the period hard-on, where's Bright Star? Ravishing use of color-coordinated floral exteriors (and, in one scene, live butterflies) to underscore the capital-R Romantic rapture of the story. -Ed.]
Sound Editing
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Star Trek
Up
WILL WIN: This one is for sound effects so Avatar should prove irresistible and I don't really have an opinion about sound effects.
Sound Mixing
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Star Trek
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
WILL WIN: This is for overall sound, so I'm guessing The Hurt Locker, though if it's for overall sound, I'm not sure what Transformers is doing here. They should not be thanked for letting us hear that dialogue.
Score
Avatar
Fantastic Mr. Fox
The Hurt Locker
Sherlock Holmes
Up
WILL WIN: I wouldn't be surprised to see any of the majority-animated movies take this prize, but Up will win out.
SHOULD WIN: If we want to talk about awesome years, to hell with Sandra Bullock; let's talk about Michael Giacchino. Dude scored Up, Star Trek, and, um, Land of the Lost (hey, I liked that one too). Hopefully he'll be rewarded here.
MISSING: I dug the portent of the Arcade Fire-y score to The Box.
Song
"Almost There," The Princess and the Frog
"Down in New Orleans," The Princess and the Frog
"Loin de Paname," Paris 36
"Take It All," Nine
"The Weary Kind," Crazy Heart
WILL WIN: "The Weary Kind."
SHOULD WIN: Those Frog songs are OK, but yeah, "The Weary Kind" should definitely win [Yesbut it's tops the third-best song they wrote for that character, sorta like how "I'm Easy" was barely one of the better half-dozen songs in Nashville. -Ed.].
MISSING: I should never look at the full Oscar song eligibility list that comes out a few weeks before the nominations; otherwise, it wouldn't even occur to me that "Petey's Song" by Jarvis Cocker from Fantastic Mr. Fox could've been included. I guess it really was bad songwriting, Petey.
Visual Effects
Avatar
District 9
Star Trek
WILL WIN: Avatar.
SHOULD WIN: No contrarian here: mother-effing Avatar.
MISSING: They nominated three really nice-looking movies, so I'm not going to complain.
Animated Feature
Coraline
Fantastic Mr. Fox
The Princess and the Frog
The Secret of Kells
Up
WILL WIN: Barring unforeseen Pixar fatigue, it will be difficult for most people to ignore how much they loved Up.
SHOULD WIN: It's not really fair; Fantastic Mr. Fox or Coraline would be the best in any number of non-Pixar years (or even in the years of Cars or Finding Nemo), but, yeah, sorry, impossible to ignore how much I loved Up. That said, if Fox or Coraline wins, it'll be a neat surprise.
MISSING: I haven't seen The Secret of Kells and have no idea how it got in, but this category mostly rules, so no complaints.
Best Adapted Screenplay
Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell, District 9
Nick Hornby, An Education
Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche, In the Loop
Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious: Adapted from the Novel by That Sapphire Lady You've Heard So Much About
Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air
WILL WIN: Up in the Air is exactly what Hollywood thinks of as a screenplay movie [In that its script was worked independently on by multiple people and its final screenplay decided as the result of Writer's Guild arbitration? -Ed.], even when the writing isn't one of its chief strengths. It should dominate a surprisingly wan category.
SHOULD WIN: Either British import would please me most. ["At the end of a war you need some soldiers left, really, or else it looks like you've lost." -Ed.]
MISSING: The difficulties of translating beloved (and short!) books into the feature-film versions of Fantastic Mr. Fox and Where the Wild Things Are warrant more recognition than the rambling novelty act of District 9.
Best Original Screenplay
Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker
Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds
Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman, The Messenger
Joel Coen & Ethan Coen, A Serious Man
Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Up
WILL WIN: It's between Locker and Basterds; the latter presents an opportunity to reward Tarantino without giving him the director Oscar, so I think he'll get it.
SHOULD WIN: Up, Basterds, and Serious Man were three of my favorites last year; I'd give it to Basterds for its unique approach to fudging historical details.
MISSING: Rian Johnson's script for The Brothers Bloom was the backbone of that movie's crazy invention. I know "Best Original" is not the same as "Most Original," but Bloom eliminates the need for that distinction.
Best Director
Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker
James Cameron, Avatar
Lee Daniels, Precious
Jason Reitman, Up in the Air
Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds
WILL WIN: Bigelow; one giant leap for ladykind.
SHOULD WIN: Tarantino. But I'm not anti-lady! I liked Sofia Coppola the best of the five that year!
MISSING: I'd take the Coens, the Up team, Rian Johnson, or Spike Jonze over several of these acceptable choices. [James Gray is a master of tone, has an aching sense of place, a poetic way with light, and always, always coaxes great performances of out his actors. And it's not like his movies are so unobtrusive that you don't notice they're directed, or anything; he actually does less to make himself known in Two Lovers than Reitman's supposedly "functional" work in UITA. I'm by no means a partisan about him—these things are just objectively true. Maybe if he had cut from a close-up of baking kugel to Joaquin Phoenix panting away on top of Vinessa Shaw or something. And since you've cited the lighting and editing of Public Enemies, I'll throw out the man(n) who's maintained a distinct and absolutely unique aesthetic over several films made with several technical collaborators. -Ed.]

Showing 1-3 of 3