“In 2009, the Census Bureau estimated a 4.1 percent population growth for Brooklyn since 2000, yet the numbers released today claimed only a 1.6 percent increase," he said, according to the Bed Stuy Patch. "It is inconceivable that Brooklyn—the hottest borough in which to live, work and play—grew only a small percentage in the past decade."
Markowitz has suggested that Brooklyn's Asian population went undercounted—seriously, I was in Chinatown this morning and there were so many Asians there!—as well as residents in predominantly African-American Central Brooklyn. In fact, the city's black population decreased (by almost 50,000 residents) for the first time since Civil War times (says Patch), demographically replaced by Asians (up 75,000) and Hispanics (up 8,000), according to a handy chart concocted by The Local.
In response, the Census is basically telling people like Chuck Schumer—who said "the Census Bureau has never known how to count urban populations and needs to go back to the drawing board"—to shove it.
"Nationally the growth rate from 2000 was one of the lowest measured in the last century," the Census' associate director of communications told the Observer. "The pattern in New York City as like that seen in many other large cities—higher rates of growth in suburbs than in urban cores."
But, but....it doesn't feel that way!