
In VIP’s larger fairs, I always found art I liked. That’s been more difficult with these specialized events. By and large, the fair’s slew of middling work is its biggest problem: there’s a glitzy celebrity portrait by Vik Muniz (Rena Bransten Gallery), a boob sticking out from a tower of flowers (Hasted Kraeutler), and a prepubescent girl wearing antlers like angel wings (Jackson Fine Art). And that’s too bad because VIP’s interactive format, which allows for chatting with gallerists and other fair-goers, makes looking at art online pretty fun.
Still, some exhibitors stand out. Aperture Foundation knows how to do photography and fairs, but I wouldn’t expect anything less from a long-standing non-profit devoted to photography. They’re seen frequently at other art fairs, displaying their books and limited-editions, so they’ve got lots of experience. I’m a big fan of their spooky, overexposed Richard Misrach landscape and this elegant, light-filled work by Sarah Palmer.
But as much as I like these works, they’re pretty straightforward landscapes and still-lifes. They don’t excite me the way that good art at other fairs have, which is disappointing.
As for the other exhibitors, the worst has to be A|B|C ontemporary. It’s all pretty derivative, or in the case of Swiss artist Antal Thoma, totally disgusting. [NSFW]
An impromptu poll around the AFC office determined that none of the five people asked could figure out what’s happening to this woman’s abdomen. I think her intestines are spilling out of her chest, and a chicken’s about to eat them. Yick.
So there you go. If the work’s not “yick,” it’s “meh” at VIP Photo. I think I'll just wait for VIP Vernissage.
VIP Photo runs through August 12th.