Beyond the Planet of the Apes Marathon

Filed Under: Film

Jesse Hassenger on Movie Revivals Throughout Our Fair City

I've been thinking about film revivals recently, in part because the Ziegfeld Theater is finishing up their annual (or semi-annual; I'm not really sure because the Clearview conglomerate that owns the Ziegfeld makes damn sure that the web page is as uninformative as possible) Hollywood classics series. Part nostalgia kick and part tacit admittance that there isn't anything worth playing in a movie palace in the February-through-April corridor, the Ziegfeld takes a break from showing big summer movies or musical Oscar bait to screen old movies with loose categorizations like "Spielberg week" or "Go Ape Week."

In researching the Ziegfeld Classics series, I came across this page -- intended as a profile of the Ziegfeld in the context of other classic moviehouses, the comment section also functions as an internet thread that has run for approximately seven years, though the bulk of the thread has lasted for a mere three or four. This informal info-sharing regarding the Ziegfeld only underscores the relatively unhelpfulness of the official site, which drove me to movietickets.com to finally determined that "Go Ape" week is not, in fact, a series of classic ape-themed movies, nor even a marathon of Planet of the Apes movies, but rather a weeklong fortieth-anniversary revival of the first Planet of the Apes movie only, which I guess makes sense, but how often do you get to see Conquest of the Planet of the Apes on the big screen? Or Beyond the Planet of the Apes? (The answer to the second question is "never" because I made that one up. If the Ziegfeld ran a Planet of the Apes marathon you'd have a better shot at knowing that.)


The recent "Spielberg week," likewise, was not an overview of the director's career, but a small repertoire of his most famous movies: Jaws, E.T., and, uh, Back to the Future, which he only produced. If I recall correctly, at least two of those movies were offered up the last time "Spielberg week" came up in the classics rotation, as were West Side Story and The Sound of Music, both of which screened a couple of weeks ago. Next up, after a break for Shine a Light in April, is a bunch of old James Bond movies, for a cinematic experience so rare and elusive that it can only be captured here or on one of three Turner-owned cable channels several times a year.

This is not to say that I'm arguing for more obscure or experimental movies to play at one of the biggest capacity theaters in Manhattan -- just that the Ziegfeld's picks seem a little repetitive, like the campus film series that starts to cycle back to play a bunch of stuff you've already seen during your senior year. Love the idea -- of mainstream, accessible revivals, that is -- but not crazy about the execution. Spielberg week, for example, could feature more offbeat choices like Minority Report, A.I., or Empire of the Sun. Okay, maybe those would be sparsely attended at best, but why on earth isn't there an Indiana Jones series leading up to this Kingdom of the Crystal Skull business? As you may have guessed from my Planet of the Apes grousing, I'm a sucker for series, so I'd love to see the Back to the Future trilogy represented in full, or each and every Batman movie, even/especially Batman & Robin.

A more wide-ranging, comprehensive, and all-around delightful mainstream revival program can be found at the Film Forum as they get ready to present an anniversary series of United Artists films, including two-for-one admission on movies featuring artists as diverse as Woody Allen, Stanley Kubrick, John Wayne, Billy Wilder, the Beatles, Peter Sellers, Robert Altman, Charlie Chaplin and, yes, James Bond. Still, the venue isn't as exciting as the Ziegfeld, where I did manage to see Raging Bull (playing this weekend at the UA retrospective) a bunch of years ago. Due respect to the Film Forum, but given their facilities, how different will the UA retrospective be from watching a film series curated in a church basement, except that maybe the Film Forum crowd is a little more self-righteous?

I kid, sort of. I do want to check out Manhattan, which I haven't seen since I was too young to really get it, or Some Like It Hot, which I haven't seen period, or Topkapi, which I've only seen in the sense that apparently every heist movie rips it off something fierce. In general, I haven't taken nearly enough advantage of the revival circuit since moving here; last fall, when I went to see the "final cut" of Blade Runner (also at the Ziegfeld), I was forced to admit to myself that the revivals most likely to get me into the theater (not counting aforementioned campus film series) are sci-fi: Blade Runner, 2001, THX1138. In other words, descendents of the Star Wars special editions: old movies that speak to my sense of nerdly duty.

Other revivals I've actually attended recently have been the midnight snows at the Landmark, which I like to imagine engaged in fierce rivalry with the IFC Center's Waverly at Midnights over who gets which old John Hughes and/or David Lynch prints. Both series lean towards some obvious hipster touchstones, but this spring that means a Sunshine slate including The Muppet Movie, The Wall, Blade Runner, Control, Alien, Blue Velvet, and Dazed and Confused. I attended Boogie Nights and The Royal Tenenbaums; I hadn't seen the former in a good ten years, and I've seen the latter more times in the theater than any non-Star Wars movies (and more than many non-non-Star Wars movies). That is to say that as happy as I was to see Raging Bull or THX1138 for the first time in a theater, maybe what I secretly crave from a revival is at least vague familiarity -- a movie I know I like but don't have on DVD. In that case, I am not-so-secretly disappointed in myself and my lack of drive to cineducate myself.

So I put it to you, hypothetical readers of this post: what's the right balance between fresh and familiar for trekking out to see a not-so-new release? What are your dream movie revivals in the DVD era?

Comments

Posted by 
In talking about places like the Ziegfeld and IFC and Landmark Sunshine, it's nice that first-run theaters are giving screen time to older films, even if they are ones that're readily available -- yeah, I you or I can see them on DVD, but sometimes it's nice for the theatrical experience.

For that reason I'm not that excited by the UA series at Film Forum -- it's true that I'll go a couple of times to see some movies I haven't seen for whatever reason, or that I like or want to see (the Thieves Like Us/Long Goodbye double feature toward the end, almost certainly; I've seen both multiple times and have ready access to the latter on DVD, but, you know, I like going to the movies). I'll enjoy myself and I'm glad they're making money, but come summer they're doing a Tatsuya Nakadai series, and I'm like trembling with excitement. I discovered him in the fall of 2005 when for whatever reason the city's rep screens were overflowing with Japanese films -- good times all around, especially for the reminder that there's this whole national cinema that we know less than we should about, and the opportunity to see movies absolutely unavailable here. (In general, our knowledge of the breadth of history of Asian film is spottier than, say, our knowledge of European film, so I'm even more prejudiced than I would otherwise be towards repertory cinema as platform for the unavailable.)

One might also recall that, in the days before there was even such a thing as home video, all film history was confined to repertory screens and classrooms (hence a site like CinemaTreasures, the comment threads of which contain a lot of memories about that time we were at NYU and we spent an entire semester watching 60s Godard at a theater on 8th St, which is not there anymore because of home viewing). It's changing, but there's still so effin' much I haven't seen and often can't, really, so "my repertory cinema" tends more towards screens that tend more towards cineducation, to use your phrase. None of which is to deny the meatloaf-level com
Posted by 
what is this guy talking about? this is apples and oranges. ziegfeld is a first-run theater that occasionally has revivals; film forum is a repertory house that also premieres small films.
Posted by 
I'm talking about mainstream, relatively broad-appeal revivals, which both the Ziegfeld and the Film Forum are doing at the moment, regardless of their regular schedules. Seems pretty apples-to-apples to me. I mean, I'm not criticizing the Ziegfeld for not showing Killer of Sheep and I'm not criticizing the Film Forum for not showing the Indiana Jones movies. I'm more curious about what gets people out to revival programming.
Posted by 
my dream revival for this year- 1968 themed one, movies from 1968, and movies about 1968, do one from each major country and pair em up. It might be interesting. '68- big year.

I forgot to mention yesterday, a good program at FIlm Forum few years back was the Godzilla movie retrospective.

Also as far as Planet of the Apes series, I think that was done around the time the Tim Burton remake came out, but I might be thinking of the DVD box. "Escape from the Planet of the Apes" I rate pretty high, that's the one where Cornelius and Zera travel back in time to 20th century earth, a classic final scene that gives me the fucking chills just thinking about it.
Posted by 
I'm a regular poster on the Ziegfeld page at cinematreasures.org and have had the pleasure of introducing the Saturday night screenings during the Classics series, including the upcoming "Planet of the Apes," tomorrow.

The fact that the Ziegfeld still even exists as a large single screen facility with a balcony and a fabulous sound system is truly a miracle. Along with the recently defunce Astor Plaza in Times Square, all of New York's great palaces are gone.

And yes, I would love to see movies at Radio City again, that's not going to happen, even though it's a more spectacular place with an even larger screen.

Going to see a movie, any movie, at the Ziegfeld is something special, but with the competition from the AMC 25, the 42nd Street e-walk, and your neighborhood multiplex, most people don't really care where they see a film--and that's the problem.

When Indy 4, opens on May 22, many will come to the Ziegfeld for the experience, and those who don't, and go somewhere else, will enjoy the film but not in the same way.

For the classics, there necessarily has to be some compromise, because, there will always be people who want to see "Grease" or "West Side Story" or "Jaws," again and again and again. And after all, business is business.

But let's not be too harsh, in 2006, when two Classics series were run, "Dr. Zhivago," "Ben-Hur," "The Godfather" and "Chinatown" were mixed in with "Citizen Kane" and "Casablanca," and yes, all of the Indiana Jones films.

Can you fill the Ziegfeld with "Last Year at Marienbad" or "The Battle of Algiers"? Does it pay to even open the doors?

This is why we are blessed with the Film Forum, the Ziegfeld, and don't forget MOMA, and the soon to be even more fabulous, Moving Image in Astoria.

New York is still a great movie town--come to the Ziegfeld, anytime, and enjoy.

Name
URL (remove the http://)
Email
Comments
   
TrackBack Link
Return to listings

contact | site credits