I saw the same piece in the ICA a couple of years ago, and it was literally one of the most thought-provoking experiences I've ever had. I loved it. Here's the exact point at which the reviewer went wrong, I reckon: "I took the tour again, determined to draw further meaning out of the work." It's not a game to be beaten, or even a puzzle to be figured out. And the first time is always the best, of course. Better to stew in the incompleteness of it, or draw your own conclusions. When the whole piece is a question, how can you blame it for not providing any answers?
© 2013 The L Magazine
Website powered by Foundation