<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>




































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Art Catch: Mary Heilmann and Elizabeth Peyton
    
      by Sharon</title>
      <link>http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2008/11/11/art-catch-mary-heilmann-and-elizabeth-peyton</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/Rss.xml?oid=1147277&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Art Catch: Mary Heilmann and Elizabeth Peyton
    
      by Sharon</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 The L Magazine. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The L Magazine readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The L Magazine.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (The L Magazine Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:30:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Art Catch: Mary Heilmann and Elizabeth Peyton]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2008/11/11/art-catch-mary-heilmann-and-elizabeth-peyton/#1149780]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2008/11/11/art-catch-mary-heilmann-and-elizabeth-peyton/#1149780]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[beebe]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I agree with the assertion that Peyton's work is inherently lacking. I can't dispute the quality of some (I said *some*) of the paintings from a technical standpoint. However, there is something too self-congratulatory and too knowingly hip about the paintings. (The same thing can be said of most of Annie Leibovitz's celebrity protraits. The implicit connection between Peyton and Leibovitz is illustrated by the wee portrait of Susan Sontag tucked away corner of the exhibit's two sterile chambers.)  Peyton often seems intoxicated with the "magic" of the her own eye and, as a result, a lot of the paintings slip into milk sugar twee-ness.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by beebe]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:01:00 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thelmagazine.com">The L Magazine</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




