<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>









































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: More Oscars! Kinda.
    
      by Benjamin Sutton</title>
      <link>http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/Rss.xml?oid=1194662&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: More Oscars! Kinda.
    
      by Benjamin Sutton</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 The L Magazine. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The L Magazine readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The L Magazine.</copyright>
      <webMaster>editor@thelmagazine.com (The L Magazine Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:15:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: More Oscars! Kinda.]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda/#1195041]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda/#1195041]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Benjamin Sutton]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thanks for the Oscar history lesson, Jesse, 70 years it is.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/Profile?oid=1151166">Benjamin Sutton</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:56:08 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thelmagazine.com">The L Magazine</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: More Oscars! Kinda.]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda/#1195006]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda/#1195006]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[jesse]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Five is actually the number of nominees for the past 70 or so years, not 81 -- this is actually a revival of how they did it through much of the thirties.<br>
<br>
On one hand, picking five movies instead of ten seems arbitrary when most critics deal in ten-best lists, and having ten instead of five increases the likelihood of recognition of the types of movies that should've been nominated but were just a little too entertaining (Dark Knight, Wall-E, Almost Famous) or a little too smart/arty (Eternal Sunshine, Children of Men, Zodiac). It could also theoretically up the vote-splitting/unpredictability factor.<br>
<br>
But as others have pointed out, if you have ten Best Picture nominees and keep everything else at five, well, then, the frontrunners will be pretty obvious if you look at the Best Director nominees.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/Profile?oid=1183624">jesse</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:48:57 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thelmagazine.com">The L Magazine</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: More Oscars! Kinda.]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda/#1195004]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2009/06/24/more-oscars-kinda/#1195004]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[nadia]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[That's really ridiculous. They couldn't pick 10 great movies that could even be nominate for the award probably.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/Profile?oid=1174321">nadia</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thelmagazine.com">The L Magazine</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



