http://www.thelmagazine.com/TheMeasure/archives/2010/01/29/in-defense-of-hollow-man Comments On: In Defense of <i>Hollow Man</i> by Benjamin Strong en-us Copyright 2013 The L Magazine. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The L Magazine readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The L Magazine. editor@thelmagazine.com (The L Magazine Webmaster) Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Tue, 21 May 2013 20:00:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by Paul Brunick]]> Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:41:14 -0500 The L Magazine Posted by bstrong]]> Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:42:14 -0500 The L Magazine
I remember reading at the time that Verhoeven fought the studio a bit over tone: he wanted to go further with the unsavory implications of invisibility, particularly the ability to fulfill desires without consequence.

And Ben told me as we were talking this one over that "Verhoeven claims that his location scouts were instructed to find an apartment complex in D.C. that had the exact same distance as the buildings in Rear Window." This for an invisible man movie with Kevin Bacon!
Posted by Mark Asch]]> Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:30:52 -0500 The L Magazine Posted by Paul Brunick]]> Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:22:45 -0500 The L Magazine "Like it or not, Kevin Bacon’s penis has become something of a minor celebrity, and those so inclined can receive, in the spiffy new invisible-man schtick Hollow Man, a veritable Baconian schlong variety pack: you see the member skinless (amidst body-layer transformations that explicitly refer to those “3D Human Body” models we had as kids), you see it through infrared glasses, you see it invisibly coated with water.
Posted by Mike Atkinson]]> Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:35:43 -0500 The L Magazine